UK News

Brexit: Arron Banks challenged over Leave.EU funds

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Media captionLeave.EU co-founder Arron Banks tells the BBC all the money he donated to it was UK-generated

Businessman Arron Banks has been challenged to explain where the money for his Brexit campaign came from.

Mr Banks is the subject of a police probe into claims he was not the “true source” of £8m loaned to his Leave.EU campaign at the 2016 EU referendum.

The Electoral Commission referred the case to the National Crime Agency, which said potential criminal offences may have been committed.

Mr Banks told the BBC’s Andrew Marr the money came from his UK businesses.

Foreign donations to political campaigns are banned under UK law.

Mr Banks has faced claims that money to fund Leave.EU came from Russian sources – something he has repeatedly denied.

“There was no Russian money and no interference of any type. I want to be absolutely clear about that,” he told the BBC’s Andrew Marr show.

“The money came from Rock Services which was a UK limited company.”

Who is Arron Banks?

  • The Bristol-based insurance tycoon, who was born in Cheshire, was a Lloyd’s underwriter before starting his own firms
  • The twice married father-of-five has been a close friend and supporter of Nigel Farage
  • Mr Banks was a Conservative supporter until 2014 when he defected to UKIP, giving them £1m
  • He is said to be one of the biggest political donors in UK history, thought to have given up to £9.6m to Leave.EU – which he co-founded – and UKIP
  • Leave.EU, which was backed by then UKIP leader Mr Farage, lost out to Vote Leave in the battle to become the official Leave campaign in the 2016 EU referendum
  • His Leave.EU campaign targeted its message at voters angry about EU immigration

What’s the investigation about?

The Electoral Commission says it suspects the money came from Rock Services parent company Rock Holdings, which is registered in the Isle of Man and so “could not lawfully make any donation or be a party to any loan to Leave.EU”.

The Commission referred the case to the National Crime Agency because it has the ability to investigate financial transactions in the Isle of Man, something that is beyond the scope of the electoral watchdog.

Mr Banks denied Rock Services was a “shell company” that did not have sufficient funds to be the source of the money for Better for the Country (BFTC), which ran Leave.EU.

In its report on the case, the Electoral Commission said: “We have reasonable grounds to suspect that Rock Services did not fund the payments of £8m it is said it made to BFTC from its UK-generated income”.

Has Arron Banks’ story changed?

Mr Banks has given two apparently different explanations about the role of Rock Services.

In his evidence to Culture Media and Sport Committee in June, Mr Banks described Rock Services as “just a service company”.

He told MPs: “The actual loan came from one of my companies that was delivered in.”

In his Andrew Marr interview he again described Rock Services as a “service company” but said it was a UK limited company and the £8m donation came out of “insurance business written in the UK”.

He said: “We turn over £250m of premiums, it’s a sizeable business” and added Rock Services has “all sorts of revenues” but did not detail them.


Manveen Rana, BBC Today reporter

The money trail was at the heart of Arron Banks’ interview with Andrew Marr. It was the first time he’d been questioned in detail since the National Crime Agency announced that he was under investigation.

Mr Banks looked at his most uncomfortable when the apparent discrepancy about the role of Rock Services was put to him. He replied: “The Electoral Commission have referred us. We will explain ourselves and our accounts. And we’re very happy about that.”

As the criminal investigation gets under way, Arron Banks can expect months more scrutiny about his finances.

Where does the investigation go from here?

The National Crime Agency said: “This is now a live investigation, and we are unable to discuss any operational detail.”

Separately, the Metropolitan Police is examining whether to launch a criminal investigation into whether Leave.EU broke its £700,000 spending limits, after a file was handed to it by the Electoral Commission. The Met is also examining electoral law breaches by the official Vote Leave campaign.

And, in another development, Mr Banks has been accused of misleading Parliament over links between Leave.EU and his insurance businesses.

Image caption Damian Collins has accused Mr Banks of misleading his committee

The Observer says it has seen internal emails leaked by former employees of Eldon Insurance, another of Mr Banks’s companies, and Rock Services that show they worked on the Leave.EU campaign from their company offices.

Conservative MP and chairman of the culture media and sport committee, Damian Collins, told The Observer the leaked e-mails appeared to “flatly contradict” what Mr Banks had told his committee in June.

Mr Banks told Andrew Marr: “I can say that was reported to the Electoral Commission, and people who did work for Eldon were transferred over on short-term contracts legally, and it was reported through the Electoral Commission in the right way.

“You are talking about emails that were stolen from us.”

The Electoral Commission said Leave.EU “did not report spending on or donations from Eldon”.

On Tuesday, the Information Commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, will announce the outcome of an inquiry into claims that Eldon shared customer data obtained for insurance purposes with Leave.EU, potentially breaking data protection laws.

“We are also investigating whether Eldon Insurance Limited’s call centre staff used customer databases to make calls on behalf of Leave.EU in contravention of the Privacy and Electronic Communication Regulations 2003,” the ICO said in an interim report in July.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *